This is the fourth of the Penitential Psalms. It marks the beginning of a series of fifteen psalms, (L-LXIV) composed by David. It is easy to discern, in its details as in its totality, the signature of this Prince. Compare, for example, verse 6 and the text of II Kings xii, 9 and 13.
 |
“Have mercy on me, O God, according to thy great mercy.” Nathan Confronts David, 1860. Woodcut by Julius Schnorr von Karolsfeld. “Die Bibel in Bildern.” Public domain. |
The occasion of its writing may be determined with the greatest precision through the words “when Nathan the Prophet came to him.” This prophet had come to find David in the name of the Lord, he had reproached him discreetly but firmly for his double crime and he had caused the blindfold to fall from his eyes which passion had kept in place for nearly a year. Cf. II Kings xii, 1 et seq. The king, touched to the very depths of his soul and understanding how greatly he had offended God, gave free rein to the feelings of repentance agitating his heart, proceeding to write Psalms VI, XXXI and L. There is every reason to believe that Psalm L was the second one he wrote.
The subject matter is therefore evident from what we have said. The “Miserere” is a magnificent commentary on the word “Peccavi” which David uttered as soon as he had recognised the enormity of his sin (II Kings xii, 13). Although he had received from Nathan a precious assurance of pardon, the guilty king wanted to obtain an even more perfect remission of his sins and this is the reason for the pressing appeal he addresses to Divine mercy. The sentiments he describes are admirable ones: the most sincere repentance, a humble confession, trust in God, an ardent supplication along with promises to lead a holy life in the future. All of this has a style and incorporates imagery which students of literature cannot but celebrate and its overall is to produce a remarkable unity of conception. There is here truly the most beautiful of acts of contrition; never has a sinner felt so tenderly and expressed so powerfully the need to obtain pardon for his sins. It does not take much to discover in this Psalm an evangelical spirit and character. The canticle has always been particularly treasured by the Church and by the Saints. It may also be said, moreover, that there are few pages in the Bible which contain so many dogmatic truths in so few lines: Sin stains the soul; it is a direct offence against God; only God Himself, the unique dispenser of graces, can erase it; pardon is obtained only through contrition ; original sin exists, etcetera.
Structure: the psalm may be divided into two parts : the first, verses 3-14, contains the prayer for pardon; the second, verses 15-21, is a promise of thanksgiving.
First part: an insistent prayer pardon. Verses 3-14.
3-4:In contemplating his soul, the supplicant sees sin after sin, crimes of every kind committed over entire months ; and so he repeats unceasingly, in his humble confession, the words “iniquity” and “sin.” In Hebrew, the song makes use of three distinct expressions: pesa, transgression which separates man from his God; hâtah, staining or straying; âvah, the perversion of moral qualities. For such evils, there is only one remedy – the infinite mercy of God. This is why David uses the words “according to thy great mercy and according to the multitude of thy tender mercies.” The Lord will need to make use of multiple operations to make sins so serious disappear and this is indicated by the choice of verbs. “blot out” (dele), in Hebrew mâhah, which means to wash an object thoroughly or even to erase written characters; “wash” (lava), in Hebrew kâbas, which applies to the pounding actions of fullers when there are stains deep in material; “cleanse” (munda), in Hebrew tâhar, used to indicate the purification of lepers. These opening words of the Psalm already reveal the perfect contrition in the penitence heart.
5-6: Here he recognises and confesses the whole extent of his guilt and he is not satisfied with having a dead and inert awareness of this but his feelings are animated and penetrate the innermost parts of his being, producing constantly in his soul horror and detestation in reaction to his sins.
6: “To thee only have I sinned”: these words contain a profound truth. Although guilty of grievous sin against so many people who had to suffer from the results (Bethsabee, Urias, the Israelites massacred under the walls of Rabbath-Ammon; cf. II Kings xi, 14 et seq.), David feels especially and above all that he has sinned against God. Accordingly, what do the rest amount to in comparison with this infinite outrage, this crime of divine lèse-majesté?
“that thou mayst be justified in thy words”: so that the mayest appear just, or that thy justice may be demonstrated before men.
“and mayst overcome when thou art judged”: In the Hebrew, so that thou mayest be pure, meaning innocent, or perfect.
“when thou art judged”: on the hypothesis where men permit themselves to criticise the conduct of the Lord towards the king, finding the punishment too severe. David therefore wishes to say that by confessing the whole extent of his sin, he is the first to recognise the justice of the divine punishment and accordingly he is helping this infinite justice to shine with all its brightness before those foolhardy enough to make accusations.
7-8: The prime cause of David’s crime and the opposition they caused between his and that holiness which is so dear to God. These lines provide classic support for the dogma of original sin and tradition is unanimous on this point.
8: “the uncertain and hidden things of thy wisdom”: the extraordinary graces and Illuminations that the great king had received from the Lord throughout his life and which naturally aggravated the enormity of his crime .
14: “a perfect spirit”: spiritu principali: meaning worthy of a Prince, noble and magnanimous. In the Hebrew: a spirit of goodwill, or full of generosity, which spontaneously and courageously moves towards that which is good. According to the Septuagint, a spirit of hegemony, which directs man and helps him to overcome his unruly passions. The three expressions amount to the same thing.
Part two: promises of thanksgiving. Verses 15-21.
16: “Deliver me from blood, O God,”: blood is in the plural in the Vulgate, in obvious reference to the fact that David had not only spilt the blood of Urias.
18-19: The blood and flesh of victims are not at all pleasing to God in themselves but only by virtue of the dispositions by which they are offered up to him. David can offer better a better sacrifice than sheep and bulls : a contrite spirit, a spirit broken by sincere repentance, the trembling of a deeply contrite heart.
20-21: Fearing that by virtue of being king, his crimes might have drawn down divine wrath on the whole people, he implores the Lord to bless Sion in a loving manner and then he expresses his ardent desire to be able to complete the building of the walls of the city. We know from II Kings v, 9 that David did everything he could to protect Jerusalem with defensive walls but on the other hand we learn from III Kings iii, 1 that it was actually Solomon who completed this important work.